afrexai-ai-readiness
v1.0.0全面审计AI就绪度(8维度评分),识别差距,制定含预算的90天优先行动计划。
Installation
AI Readiness Assessment
Run a structured AI readiness audit for any organization. Scores 8 dimensions, identifies gaps, produces a prioritized 90-day action plan with budget ranges.
When to Use
- Before investing in AI/automation tools
- Board or leadership requesting AI strategy
- Evaluating build vs buy decisions
- Annual technology planning
How It Works
Score each dimension 1-5 (1=not started, 5=optimized):
1. Data Infrastructure (Weight: 3x)
- [ ] Centralized data warehouse or lakehouse operational
- [ ] Data quality monitoring automated (freshness, completeness, accuracy)
- [ ] API-first architecture for core systems
- [ ] Data governance policy documented and enforced
- [ ] PII/PHI classification and access controls active
Score 1: Spreadsheets and siloed databases Score 3: Warehouse exists, some pipelines automated Score 5: Real-time streaming, quality >99%, full lineage
2. Process Documentation (Weight: 2x)
- [ ] Top 20 revenue-impacting processes mapped end-to-end
- [ ] Decision trees documented for each process
- [ ] Exception handling paths defined
- [ ] Time-per-task benchmarks established
- [ ] Process owners assigned
Score 1: Tribal knowledge, nothing written down Score 3: Major processes documented, some outdated Score 5: Living documentation, updated quarterly, covers 80%+ of operations
3. Technical Talent (Weight: 2x)
- [ ] At least 1 person understands ML/AI concepts at implementation level
- [ ] Engineering team comfortable with APIs and integrations
- [ ] DevOps/infrastructure person can deploy and monitor services
- [ ] Data analyst can query and interpret model outputs
- [ ] Security team understands AI-specific attack surfaces
Score 1: No technical staff beyond basic IT Score 3: Good engineering team, AI knowledge is theoretical Score 5: Dedicated AI/ML engineer, cross-functional AI literacy program
4. Budget & ROI Framework (Weight: 2x)
- [ ] AI budget allocated (not pulled from "innovation" slush fund)
- [ ] ROI measurement criteria defined before project starts
- [ ] Kill criteria established (when to stop a failing project)
- [ ] Total cost of ownership model includes maintenance, retraining, monitoring
- [ ] Benchmarks set against current manual process costs
Budget Reality by Company Size: | Company Size | Year 1 Investment | Expected ROI Timeline | |---|---|---| | 15-50 employees | $24K-$80K | 4-8 months | | 50-200 employees | $80K-$300K | 3-6 months | | 200-1000 employees | $300K-$1.2M | 6-12 months | | 1000+ employees | $1.2M-$5M+ | 8-18 months |
5. Change Management (Weight: 1.5x)
- [ ] Executive sponsor identified and actively involved
- [ ] Communication plan for affected teams drafted
- [ ] Training budget allocated
- [ ] Pilot team identified (volunteers, not voluntolds)
- [ ] Success metrics shared openly with organization
Score 1: Leadership says "just do AI" with no plan Score 3: Exec sponsor exists, some team buy-in Score 5: Change management playbook active, regular town halls, feedback loops
6. Security & Compliance (Weight: 2.5x)
- [ ] AI-specific data handling policy written
- [ ] Vendor security assessment process includes AI criteria
- [ ] Model output logging and audit trail planned
- [ ] Regulatory requirements mapped (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, SOC 2, EU AI Act)
- [ ] Incident response plan covers AI failures
Score 1: No AI-specific security considerations Score 3: General security strong, AI gaps identified Score 5: AI governance framework active, regular audits, compliance automated
7. Integration Readiness (Weight: 1.5x)
- [ ] Core systems have APIs (CRM, ERP, HRIS, etc.)
- [ ] Authentication/authorization supports service accounts
- [ ] Webhook or event-driven architecture available
- [ ] Test/staging environment mirrors production
- [ ] Rollback procedures documented
Score 1: Legacy systems, no APIs, manual data entry Score 3: Major systems have APIs, some manual bridges Score 5: API-first architecture, event-driven, CI/CD for integrations
8. Strategic Alignment (Weight: 1x)
- [ ] AI initiatives map to specific business objectives (not "innovation")
- [ ] 3-year technology roadmap includes AI milestones
- [ ] Competitive landscape analysis includes AI adoption by rivals
- [ ] Board/leadership educated on AI capabilities and limitations
- [ ] Failure tolerance defined (acceptable experiment failure rate)
Score 1: AI is a buzzword, no concrete strategy Score 3: Strategy exists, loosely connected to business goals Score 5: AI embedded in strategic plan, quarterly reviews, competitive moat building
Scoring
Weighted Total = Sum of (Score × Weight) / Max Possible × 100
| Range | Rating | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 0-25 | 🔴 Not Ready | Fix foundations first. 6-12 months of groundwork before AI projects. |
| 26-50 | 🟡 Early Stage | Pick ONE high-impact, low-risk pilot. Build muscle. |
| 51-75 | 🟢 Ready | Deploy 2-3 agents in validated use cases. Scale what works. |
| 76-100 | 🔵 Advanced | Multi-agent deployment, autonomous operations, competitive moat. |
90-Day Action Plan Template
Days 1-30: Foundation - Complete this assessment with honest scores - Document top 5 processes by time spent × error rate - Audit data infrastructure gaps - Set budget and kill criteria
Days 31-60: Pilot - Select highest-scoring use case (high data readiness + clear ROI) - Deploy single agent or automation - Measure daily: time saved, error rate, cost - Weekly review with stakeholders
Days 61-90: Scale or Kill - If pilot ROI > 2x: plan 2 more deployments - If pilot ROI < 1x: diagnose root cause, pivot or kill - Document learnings regardless of outcome - Update 3-year roadmap based on reality
7 Assessment Mistakes
- Scoring yourself too high — External validation beats internal optimism
- Ignoring data quality — AI on bad data = faster wrong answers
- Skipping change management — Technical success + team rejection = failure
- No kill criteria — Zombie projects drain budget and credibility
- Buying before understanding — Tool purchases before process documentation = shelfware
- Ignoring security until audit — Retrofitting AI security costs 3-5x more than building it in
- Comparing to tech companies — Your readiness bar is YOUR industry, not Silicon Valley
Industry Benchmarks (2026)
| Industry | Avg Score | Top Quartile | First AI Win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech | 62 | 78+ | Fraud detection, KYC |
| Healthcare | 41 | 58+ | Clinical documentation, scheduling |
| Legal | 38 | 52+ | Contract review, research |
| Construction | 29 | 44+ | Safety monitoring, estimation |
| Ecommerce | 58 | 74+ | Personalization, inventory |
| SaaS | 65 | 82+ | Support, onboarding, churn prediction |
| Real Estate | 35 | 48+ | Lead scoring, valuation |
| Recruitment | 45 | 62+ | Screening, outreach |
| Manufacturing | 42 | 56+ | QC, predictive maintenance |
| Professional Services | 48 | 64+ | Proposal generation, time tracking |
Get your industry-specific context pack ($47) → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/
Calculate your AI revenue leak → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/
Set up your first AI agent → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/
Bundles: Pick 3 for $97 | All 10 for $197 | Everything Pack $247