pi-workflow
v1.1.1Workflow orchestration for Pi's task management, self-improvement, and code quality standards. Use when starting new projects, managing multi-step tasks (3+ steps or architectural decisions), capturing lessons from mistakes, writing verifiable code, or establishing quality gates before completion. I...
Installation
Pi Workflow Orchestration
This skill provides Pi's structured approach to task management, quality assurance, and continuous self-improvement.
Core Workflows
1. Plan Node Default
Enter plan mode for ANY non-trivial task (3+ steps or architectural decisions): - Write detailed specs upfront to reduce ambiguity - If something goes sideways, STOP and re-plan immediately—don't keep pushing - Use plan mode for verification steps, not just building
2. Subagent Strategy
- Use subagents liberally to keep main context window clean
- Offload research, exploration, and parallel analysis to subagents
- For complex problems, throw more compute at it via subagents
- One tack per subagent for focused execution
3. Self-Improvement Loop
- After ANY correction from the user: update
tasks/lessons.mdwith metadata (Priority, Status, Area, Pattern-Key) - Log command failures to
tasks/errors.mdfor diagnosis patterns - Log feature requests to
tasks/feature_requests.mdfor future work - Write rules for yourself that prevent the same mistake
- Ruthlessly iterate on these lessons until mistake rate drops
- Review lessons at session start for relevant projects
- Track recurring patterns with Recurrence-Count (bump priority at ≥3 occurrences)
4. Verification Before Done
- Never mark a task complete without proving it works
- Diff behavior between main and your changes when relevant
- Ask yourself: "Would a staff engineer approve this?"
- Run tests, check logs, demonstrate correctness
5. Demand Elegance (Balanced)
- For non-trivial changes: pause and ask "is there a more elegant way?"
- If a fix feels hacky: "Knowing everything I know now, implement the elegant solution"
- Skip this for simple, obvious fixes—don't over-engineer
- Challenge your own work before presenting it
6. Autonomous Bug Fixing
- When given a bug report: just fix it. Don't ask for hand-holding
- Point at logs, errors, failing tests—then resolve them
- Zero context switching required from the user
- Go fix failing CI tests without being told how
Task Management
- Plan First: Write plan to
tasks/todo.mdwith checkable items - Verify Plan: Check in before starting implementation
- Track Progress: Mark items complete as you go
- Explain Changes: High-level summary at each step
- Document Results: Add review section to
tasks/todo.md - Capture Lessons: Update
tasks/lessons.mdafter corrections
File Organization
tasks/todo.md— active sprint (current project)tasks/lessons.md— corrections, insights, best practices (structured)tasks/errors.md— command failures, API errors, exceptions (NEW)tasks/feature_requests.md— missing capabilities, feature requests (NEW)memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md— session logs (daily)MEMORY.md— your curated memories (maintained by user)
See WORKFLOW_ORCHESTRATION.md for detailed reference.
See LESSONS.md for philosophy and framing.
See PHASE1-PHASE2-ENHANCED-LESSONS.md for structured lesson format and file separation.
See LESSONS_UPDATE_GUIDE.md for syncing lessons from workspace to skill.
Capturing Lessons
Lessons Format (Phase 1+2 Enhanced)
Each lesson gets structured metadata for filtering and recurring pattern detection:
## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] rule_name (category)
**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending | in_progress | resolved | promoted
**Area**: backend | infra | tests | docs | config
**Pattern-Key**: category.pattern_name (optional, for recurring detection)
### Summary
One-line description
### Details
Full context and examples
### Applied to
Projects or files where this was used
### Metadata
- Source: correction | insight | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250225-001 (if related to existing entry)
- Recurrence-Count: 1 (increment if you see it again)
- First-Seen: 2025-02-23
- Last-Seen: 2025-02-23
Errors & Features (NEW)
Log failures and feature gaps separately for better organization:
Errors (tasks/errors.md):
- Command failures, API errors, exceptions
- Include reproducibility, environment, suggested fix
Features (tasks/feature_requests.md):
- Missing capabilities, things you wish existed
- Include complexity estimate and suggested implementation
Syncing to Skill
Periodically merge workspace lessons into the published skill:
# From openclaw-workflow repo
python3 scripts/sync_lessons.py --workspace ~/.openclaw/workspace
# Dry run (preview changes)
python3 scripts/sync_lessons.py --workspace ~/.openclaw/workspace --dry-run
This merges workspace lessons into references/lessons.md for version control and sharing.
Hooks (Optional)
Enable automatic bootstrap reminders for self-improvement:
openclaw hooks enable pi-workflow
This injects a reminder at session start showing: - When to log lessons/errors/features - Format and metadata fields - Recurring pattern detection - Promotion paths
See hooks/openclaw/HOOK.md for details.
Core Principles
- Simplicity First: Make every change as simple as possible. Minimal code impact.
- No Laziness: Find root causes. No temporary fixes. Senior developer standards.
- Minimal Impact: Changes should only touch what's necessary. Avoid introducing bugs.