edisclaw

E-Discovery shouldn't cost more than the lawsuit.

Firms spend $3,000–$18,000 per gigabyte outsourcing e-discovery. edisclaw brings the entire processing pipeline into your terminal—collect, deduplicate, cull by keyword and date, tag for relevance, and export production-ready load files. All locally. All under your control.

You don't need a vendor. You need a command.

Who it's for: Litigators handling discovery, paralegals managing document review, solo attorneys who can't afford Relativity, and in-house teams running internal investigations.

What it replaces: $50K+ vendor invoices, Relativity seats you don't need, and the 3-week turnaround that kills your case timeline.

Pricing

Feature	Free	Pro ($49/mo)	Litigation ($199/mo)
ESI processing	Up to 1 GB	Up to 50 GB	Unlimited
Deduplication	MD5 only	MD5 + fuzzy near-dedup	Full near-dedup + email threading
Keyword search	Basic grep	Regex + proximity + stemming	Full-text index + Boolean
Date culling	✅	✅	✅
File type filtering	✅	✅	✅
TAR (Technology Assisted Review)	—	Seed set + prioritize	Full active learning loop
Load file export	—	Concordance (.dat)	Concordance + Relativity + EDRM XML
Email threading	—	Basic	Full conversation threading
OCR for scanned docs	—	✅	✅ + batch
Matters	1 active	10 active	Unlimited
Team reviewers	—	—	Up to 15
Audit trail	Basic	Full	Full + court-ready certification

edisclaw upgrade pro — 14-day free trial.

Core Commands

Collection & Ingestion - edisclaw ingest ./custodian_files/ --matter "Smith v. Jones" - edisclaw ingest mailbox.pst --matter "Smith v. Jones" --custodian "J. Smith" - edisclaw ingest ./emails/ --format mbox --matter "Smith v. Jones" - edisclaw ingest --source gdrive --custodian "CEO" --matter "Investigation" (Pro) - edisclaw status --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Processing progress

Deduplication - edisclaw dedup --matter "Smith v. Jones" — MD5 exact dedup - edisclaw dedup --matter "Smith v. Jones" --near — Near-dedup (Pro) - edisclaw dedup report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — How much was removed

Culling & Filtering - edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --date-from 2024-01-01 --date-to 2025-12-31 - edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --filetype pdf,docx,xlsx,msg - edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --exclude-filetype jpg,png,gif — Remove images - edisclaw cull --matter "Smith v. Jones" --min-size 1KB — Remove empty/tiny files - edisclaw cull report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Culling summary

Keyword Search - edisclaw search "merger" --matter "Smith v. Jones" - edisclaw search "merger AND acquisition" --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Boolean - edisclaw search "merger w/5 acquisition" --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Proximity (Pro) - edisclaw search --terms-file keywords.txt --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Batch keyword list - edisclaw search --report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Keyword hit report

Review & Tagging - edisclaw review start --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Interactive review mode - edisclaw tag --id DOC-001234 --tags "responsive,hot" — Tag documents - edisclaw tag --id DOC-001234 --privilege "attorney-client" — Privilege tag - edisclaw review stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Review progress

Technology Assisted Review (Litigation) - edisclaw tar seed --matter "Smith v. Jones" --count 200 — Generate seed set - edisclaw tar train --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Train model on coded docs - edisclaw tar prioritize --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Rank by likely relevance - edisclaw tar validate --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Statistical validation - edisclaw tar report --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Court-defensible TAR report

Production - edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --tag "responsive" --format concordance - edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --bates-prefix "SMITH" --start 000001 - edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --redact-pii --format pdf (Litigation) - edisclaw produce --matter "Smith v. Jones" --format edrm-xml (Litigation) - edisclaw produce log --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Production log

Reporting - edisclaw stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Full matter statistics - edisclaw stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" --by-custodian — Per custodian breakdown - edisclaw stats --matter "Smith v. Jones" --by-filetype — File type distribution - edisclaw timeline --matter "Smith v. Jones" — Document timeline visualization

Common Workflows

Standard E-Discovery Pipeline

# 1. Ingest custodian data
edisclaw ingest ./custodian_smith/ --matter "Case-2026" --custodian "Smith"
edisclaw ingest ./custodian_jones/ --matter "Case-2026" --custodian "Jones"

# 2. Deduplicate
edisclaw dedup --matter "Case-2026"

# 3. Date & file type culling
edisclaw cull --matter "Case-2026" --date-from 2023-01-01 --date-to 2025-12-31

# 4. Keyword search
edisclaw search --terms-file agreed_keywords.txt --matter "Case-2026"

# 5. Review & tag
edisclaw review start --matter "Case-2026"

# 6. Produce
edisclaw produce --matter "Case-2026" --tag "responsive" --bates-prefix "PROD" --start 000001

Notes

All data stored locally in ~/.edisclaw/ — ESI never leaves your machine on Free tier
Processing speeds: ~2 GB/hour on Free, ~10 GB/hour on Pro (parallelized)
Supports: PST, MBOX, EML, MSG, PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, TXT, CSV, HTML, images
Combine with privilegeclaw for automated privilege detection
Combine with batesclaw for advanced Bates numbering workflows
Court-defensible audit logs on all tiers

Security & Compliance

No data transmitted externally on Free tier
Pro/Litigation: encrypted API for TAR models only (no document content sent)
EDRM framework compliant
Chain of custody logging: edisclaw audit --matter "Smith v. Jones"
Defensibility report: edisclaw defensibility-report --matter "Smith v. Jones" (Litigation)

ediscclaw