marketing-hooks
v0.1.0Create compelling marketing hooks and content structures using the Puzzle-Driven Model. Use when creating social media posts, newsletters, video scripts, or any marketing content that needs to capture attention. Triggers include "write a hook", "create a title", "make this more engaging", "content s...
Installation
Marketing Hooks - Puzzle-Driven Content Model
Create attention-grabbing marketing content using proven psychological frameworks.
Core Principle: Questions Drive Engagement
Good content is driven by good questions. Good questions are puzzles.
When your opening creates a puzzle, the audience's brain automatically tries to solve it. This creates engagement and retention.
Four Question Types
1. How-Type (Method)
Pattern: "How to [achieve desired outcome]?"
Examples: - "How to become wealthy quickly?" - "From white-label to brand?" - "How to start cross-border e-commerce?" - "How to 10x your productivity with AI?"
Best for: Tutorials, guides, practical content
2. Why-Type (Reason)
Pattern: "Why [surprising fact/outcome]?"
Examples: - "Why did they become CEO?" - "Why 90% of AI tools fail?" - "Why top creators don't post daily?"
Best for: Analysis, insights, thought leadership
3. What-Type (Definition)
Pattern: "What is [concept/term]?"
Examples: - "What is supply-side reform?" - "What is CPS?" - "What is Product-Market Fit?"
Best for: Educational content, explainers
4. WoW-Type (Extreme Case) ⭐ HIGHEST ENGAGEMENT
Pattern: Create probability-defying extreme cases
Core insight: WoW = Manufacturing extremely low-probability extreme cases
Formula: - Discover extremes → Get traffic - Become extreme → Build brand
Examples: - "Gen-Z makes $100K/month with AI" - "10K followers in 3 days - the secret" - "I replaced my entire team with one tool" - "This 19-year-old built a $1M business with ChatGPT"
Why it works: Brain automatically fills in missing logic, creating engagement stickiness.
Visual/Info/Case combinations: - Extreme visual + surprising data - Impossible timeline + real results - Tiny input + massive output
Content Tree Structure
Every piece of content should follow this hierarchy:
Question (Root)
↓
Viewpoint (Trunk)
↓
Reasoning (Branches)
↓
Evidence (Leaves)
Gan Method Content Model
Structure: 1. Core viewpoint (Trunk) 2. Sub-arguments (Branches) 3. Evidence (Leaves) - Must be: - Unexpected - Memorable - Vivid
Quality check: A good 15-min video or well-evidenced article = a tree with lush branches and leaves.
Platform-Specific Applications
Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book)
Best formats: - WoW-type titles: "Gen-Z AI tools $100K/month" - How-type for tutorials: "5 AI tools for 10x efficiency"
Structure: 1. Hook (5-10s): WoW statement 2. Pain point (10-15s): "Are you also facing..." 3. Solution (120-180s): Step-by-step with demos 4. Results (20-30s): Proof 5. CTA (5-10s): "Follow for more"
X (Twitter)
Best formats: - Start with puzzle: "Do you know why 90% of people fail with AI tools?" - Then reveal answer in thread
Structure: - Tweet 1: Puzzle/Hook - Tweet 2-4: Reasoning + Evidence - Final tweet: Conclusion + CTA
Newsletter
Best formats: - Question (title) → Viewpoint (intro) → Reasoning (body) → Evidence (examples)
Structure: - Subject line: WoW or Why-type - Opening: Establish puzzle - Body: Tree structure (trunk → branches → leaves) - Closing: Actionable takeaway
Hook Generation Workflow
When asked to create hooks:
- Identify the core message
- What's the main point?
-
What outcome does the audience want?
-
Choose question type
- Practical guide? → How
- Surprising insight? → Why
- New concept? → What
-
Extreme case? → WoW (prioritize this!)
-
Apply WoW amplification
- Can you make it more extreme?
- Can you add surprising numbers?
-
Can you create contrast (small input → big output)?
-
Test the puzzle
- Does it make you think "why?" or "how?"
- Does it create information gap?
- Would you click it?
Examples Library
See EXAMPLES.md for detailed case studies and templates.
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing content:
- [ ] Does the opening create a puzzle?
- [ ] Is there a clear tree structure (root → trunk → branches → leaves)?
- [ ] Are the evidence points unexpected, memorable, and vivid?
- [ ] For WoW-type: Is the case extreme enough?
- [ ] Does it make the brain want to "fill in the gaps"?
References
- "Writing is a Craft" - "Questions are the engine of articles"
- Gan Method - Content tree structure
- WoW Psychology - Extreme case engagement mechanics